Peer Review two colleagues that have yet to receive feedback from at least two students. In your response, include whether you think the diagram effectively documents the case. Provide an example to support your position.
~Provides constructive, substantial, and meaningful input that is specific and directly related to the work-product of the colleague as it pertains to the assignment and weekly outcomes that will further assist your peer in developing his or her treatise
~Provides comments on organization, grammar, and proper APA formatting
~Remains professional in tone at all times.
General Guidance on Peer Feedback Length: Feedback to a peer will typically be 2-3 paragraphs and may also include revisions to the diagram itself.
2. Respond to two or more of your colleagues in one or more of the following ways:
~Compare your conclusions about the root causes and potential solutions in the case study to those offered by your colleague.
~Provide a different or expanded perspective by offering an insight that you gained by reading your colleague’s conclusions.
~Ask a question that will help your colleague think about his or her conclusions more deeply or broadly. Make sure you provide context and/or references based from the class readings, your own investigation, or your experience.
~Provide an example that further illuminates the conclusions or demonstrates how such thinking is employed elsewhere.
~Offer other lessons you learned from the case and suggest ways your colleague could implement those at his or her organization.
General Guidance on Feedback Length: Feedback to a colleague will typically be 2 paragraphs